Search Results:
- Melissa Isaak, who is representing Moore in other lawsuits, filed the suit. According to the lawsuit, Moore's issue with the Examiner began with an article written by Lowe that published on May 28, All rights reserved About Us. The material on this...
- The act would strengthen the military's ability to deal with rising security challenges from China and Russia. But it would also challenge those nations in another way. It will have very simple compliance requirements, such as the listing of a name...
Racist? Under Trump, Black People And Hispanics Join Suburbs And Home Ownership Up
In a December report , Sibley noted that a U. In cases where the GAO did identify the owners, nine out of fourteen government agencies working on sensitive national security issues were unaware that the buildings in which they were housed were ultimately owned by companies in China and elsewhere. A key success of the Trump administration has been its dramatic and diverse increase of pressure on the Chinese Communist Party. This act would advance that success in a new way.- This produced his first fortune in the oil business. For several years, Anschutz was Colorado's sole billionaire. With his acquisition of land in other Western states, he became one of the largest landholders in the United States. In , Fortune magazine compared him to the 19th-century tycoon J. Morgan , as both men "struck it rich in a fundamentally different way: they operated across an astounding array of industries, mastering and reshaping entire economic landscapes. Before the merger, he was a director of Southern Pacific from June to September , and non-executive chairman of Southern Pacific from to September He was also a director of Forest Oil Corporation beginning in In November he became Director and Chairman of the Board of Qwest , stepping down as a non-executive co-chairman in but remaining on the board.
Clint Reilly, S.F. Examiner’s New Owner, Vows To Expand Paper’s Newsroom, Coverage
In May , the Bush administration upheld Anschutz's right to drill an exploratory oil well at Weatherman Draw in south-central Montana where Native American tribes wanted to preserve sacred rock drawings. Environmental groups, preservationists, and ten Native American tribes appealed the decision without success. In April , the Anschutz Exploration Corporation gave up its plans to drill for oil in the area. In return, Spitzer dropped his civil suit. Securities and Exchange Commission and the U. Department of Justice extensively investigated Qwest officials and determined there was no justification for taking action against any board member. The Denver Post summarized the implications for Anschutz: "Not only is Qwest founder and board member Philip Anschutz not a defendant in the long-awaited civil case against the regime of former Qwest chief executive Joe Nacchio, he doesn't even merit a mention in the page complaint.- Xanterra purchased the resort from Busch Properties, Inc. It is the world's largest owner of sports teams, sports events, and sports venues. It is also the owner of entertainment venues and under AEG Live the world's second-largest presenter of live music and entertainment events after Live Nation. On September 18, , Anschutz announced he was putting AEG up for sale, but he decided not to accept [20] any of the bids, and on March 14, , took AEG off the market. For this reason, Anschutz has been called the man who saved MLS. For example, he pushed for the building of soccer-specific stadiums, allowing MLS teams to increase revenue and better control costs. MLS teams and now owns only the Galaxy. Anschutz owns more than half of the company, and multiple newspapers and media groups.
A Conservative Magazine May Pay A Price For Being Unfriendly To Trump
Anschutz has invested in, for example, the Clarity Media Group , a Denver-based publishing group that includes [28] newspapers such as The Oklahoman , the largest newspaper in Oklahoma; The San Francisco Examiner purchased in , sold in November ; The Washington Examiner , a right-wing weekly tabloid that was consolidated from group of D.- On December 14, , Anschultz executed the closure of The Weekly Standard and fired all its employees. Editor in Chief Stephen Hayes had initially been cleared to find a buyer but after a venture capital firm agreed to broker any future deal, Anschutz withdrew permission and decided to effectively kill the company in order to harvest its subscribers. Closing was expected in October In March , it was reported that Anschutz was interested in buying the Rangers. He also invested in the Power Company of Wyoming LLC, [32] formed in [33] re-incorporated in [34] for the purpose of building the Chokecherry and Sierra Madre wind power complex in Carbon County, Wyoming, comprising up to 1, wind turbines with up to 3, megawatts of capacity.
Bloomberg Editor Brings Political Chops To Washington Examiner
When combined, they comprise the largest commercial wind generation facility proposed in the U. The land came from the recently closed Fitzsimons Army Medical Center, but millions were needed for the construction of new medical laboratory buildings and a new University Hospital on the land. They have also donated to the University of Kansas , their alma mater. Simon Prize for Philanthropic Leadership. Business Hall of Fame in Archived from the original on August 9, Retrieved July 25, Archived from the original on October 7, Retrieved September 9, Archived from the original on September 14, Retrieved April 8, Archived from the original on February 19, Retrieved May 21, Aspen Business Journal. Archived from the original on January 13, Retrieved January 12,- History[ edit ] A Washington Examiner dispenser, from the time when the newspaper was a free daily paper. The publication now known as the Washington Examiner began its life as a handful of suburban news outlets known as the Journal Newspapers, distributed not in Washington D. In March , the company announced that it would stop printing a daily edition in June and refocus on national politics. The print edition was converted to a weekly magazine, while the website was continually updated.
Shell Sets Its Sights On Deploying 500,000 Electronic Vehicle Chargers By 2025
Moore, former chief justice of the Alabama Supreme Court and candidate in the United States Senate special election in Alabama for the seat left open when Jeff Sessions joined the Trump administration, claimed that the magazine repeatedly wrote "fake news" attacks stemming from allegations that he made unwanted sexual and romantic advances to girls as young as fifteen when he was in his late 30s. Nicosia denied any wrongdoing, saying he had only shared the video "because he thought it might go viral An employee's complaint seen by CNN said that Harnden had created "toxic work environment" and a climate of "workplace terror and bullying. CNN reported, however, that "current and former Examiner employees" said that "Gurdon was aware of Harnden's brutish managing style" long before it became a public issue, without doing anything about it. As online editor of the Fox News website, Wilson had published a news story supporting the conspiracy theory about murdered Democratic aide Seth Rich and Wikileaks.Kelly Loeffler Likely Won't Make The Cut As Atlanta Dream Nears Sale
The Daily Beast reported that Badani's "profile photos are stolen from the blog of an unwitting San Diego startup founder" while his "LinkedIn profile, which described him as a graduate of George Washington and Georgetown, is equally fictitious.Washington Examiner: Cruz Circulates Plan To Stop U.S. Internet Giveaway
Ethics Policy The Washington Examiner requires the highest ethical standards from all members of staff. This means being fair and accurate in reporting, and having a strong wall between news on the one hand and opinion or advocacy on the other. It also means avoiding conflicts of interest in fact and appearance, and publishing without fear or favor. Membership of outside organizations is permitted in many cases but is to be avoided if it presents an apparent conflict of interest that would compromise the employee's work, or the Washington Examiner as a whole. Staff members should not accept gifts of significant monetary value from people or organizations about whom they might write, or with whom they might come into contact in the ordinary course of their work.- If in doubt, staff members should seek guidance from their supervisor. The Washington Examiner generally pays for all expenses incurred in the course of employees doing their jobs. This applies widely, including to such things as meals while traveling for work, travel tickets, car hire, hotel accommodation, etc. Sometimes a staff member might accept an offer, for example of a speaking engagement, from an outside organization that pays all costs and a fee.
Racist? Under Trump, Black People And Hispanics Join Suburbs, And Home Ownership Up
Washington Examiner employees must seek prior approval from the Editor in Chief in such cases. There are some clear conflicts of interest that should at all times be avoided. These include but are not limited to 1 Writing about companies in which the writer has a financial interest, or about stocks in which the writer or a friend or family member intends to trade, 2 taking paid employment from a contractor of the Washington Examiner's, 3 Accepting payment from an outside source for a story appearing in the Washington Examiner, 4 Working paid or unpaid for another news organization except with permission from the editor in chief, 5 Divulging proprietary, privileged, or confidential information to recipients not approved by the management, 6 Doing work for a national political party.- Most conflicts-of-interest boil down to avoiding activities that, if known, would prompt doubt about whether an employee could do his or her job impartially. No ethics policy can detail every contingency. The overriding obligation on staff is to consider whether an activity compromises the Washington Examiner's mission or that individual's ability to do his or her job properly. Any doubts should be resolved in discussion with management. Mission and Values The Washington Examiner's mission is to produce excellent journalism online and in print. It was founded in to bring a new perspective on federal politics. This means publishing all the most important stories, which necessarily includes those that other news organizations routinely ignore.
Ex-Washington Football Team Employees Want Owner Dan Snyder Removed
Thus, the Washington Examiner's mission from the outset has been to broaden the range of political discussion, rejecting the narrow constraints of prevailing orthodoxy. We produce fresh and original stories on every aspect of politics and ideas, specifically on the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government, on legislation and regulation, national security, the economy, business, international relations, religion, and the broader culture. In all these areas we report news straight, with accuracy and balance, giving readers a clear view of what is really happening in Washington, undistorted by ideological bias. Our coverage is also deliberately fair, giving a respectful hearing to conservative ideas and conservative people who get short shrift from most other media outlets.- Washington Examiner aims for a broad range of coverage. This means publishing strong enterprise stories that dig beneath the surface. It also means running a fast paced breaking news operation, which allows readers to stay up to date in real time with important events unfolding in the federal capital, across the nation, and around the world.
- Alongside this robust news operation, Washington Examiner's mission is to publish a high volume of intelligent and incisive commentary in long features, opeds, and blog posts. We have a forthrightly conservative worldview, and so our commentary intentionally provides millions of readers with assurance that their values and outlook are an acceptable and respected part of serious and humane discussion of current affairs. Honesty and Integrity: At Washington Examiner, news and opinion run side by side, but they remain separate and are labeled clearly.
- We recognize our public obligation to maintain high ethical standards in our journalism and our business. This means we do not allow the latter to infect the former. Our constant aim is to inform readers about what is actually happening, and we do not allow any agenda to distort or deflect us from that mission.
Washington Examiner Fires Reporters, Possible Shift In News Coverage
We also strive at all times for full disclosure of relationships that, if hidden, could suggest a conflict of interest. This applies both to our own ownership and to outside sources, whether they are commenting in a news story or contributing an advocacy oped. Our commitment is to a transparent relationship with readers, so that we are a trusted source for news and opinion. Multi-platform commitment: These same values apply across all platforms as the Washington Examiner grows its influence and expands the range of products it uses to reach readers and website visitors. We aim to deliver news and commentary to readers in the forms they want, which means ceaseless innovation and adaptation to produce high-quality video, podcasts, live events, and other platforms. In all of these, we seek to maintain the same standards of excellence and integrity. To help us constantly improve, we also encourage readers to use our dedicated email inboxes for feedback, and to comment directly on stories so we have a real-time monitor of our work.- To reach new audiences and deliver excellent journalism as widely as possible, we also establish partnerships with other news outlets, such as mobile news apps. Working for readers: Washington Examiner sees itself as a servant of its readership and the general public, which means we aim on their behalf to hold government at all levels to account. We know that the decisions they make and actions they take have a direct impact on the life of the nation and its hundreds of millions of citizens. We use our penetrating access in Washington, which reaches right up to the Oval Office, to ask the questions and get the answers that most people are not in a position to demand.
October 21, 2021: Homeownership Can Help Heal The Racial Divide (Washington Examiner)
This ethos is one that we make a responsibility of each and every member of the newsroom. Washington Examiner's most important intangible asset is its integrity. Its most important element of all is its staff — the reporters and editors, web producers and page designers, bloggers and social media experts who produce and deliver our excellent journalism each and every day. We aim to foster a supportive, professional, and humane workplace, conducive to a constant output of top quality work for readers. Verification and Fact Checking The Washington Examiner strives for accuracy and takes several steps on each item of content to assure it. We check facts and claims with sources, research context, background documents, and public records. And all stories are reviewed by at least one editor before publication.- We have a dedicated feedback email email address so readers can let us know if we have made a mistake or can improve a story with additional information. We welcome outside input. Corrections Policy The Washington Examiner intends to be first with accurate news. Speed and accuracy militate against each other and sometimes errors occur. We endeavor to deal with mistakes promptly, publishing corrections, clarifications, or editor's notes as appropriate.
- This is necessary to fulfill our mission to deal honestly with readers, conceding error transparently. Corrections are required when we have published something that is objectively wrong. This can be a news story, a fact within an opinion piece, a photo caption, a headline or graphic, audio or visual data in a video. In such cases we should publish a correction explaining the error and change as swiftly as possible. Errors in email or app alerts, or on social media should be corrected on those platforms. Corrections should describe and remedy the problem, not ascribe blame. Clarifications are used when the facts are correct but the words used or syntax deployed could make the meaning confusing. The misleading phrasing should be changed for clarity, and a note should be appended to the story to acknowledge the change.
- The clarification can also be used to acknowledge that a comment has been added that was not sought initially, or that new facts have been added that alter the original account of an event or framing of the news. Editor's notes are used when there is a significant omission or ethical problem that could suggest that the story should not have been published in its original form. Editor's notes must be approved by the editor in chief or executive editors. Removal of content from website The Washington Examiner's policy is that content may be removed from its website only very rarely.
Colorado Springs Gazette Owner Launches 'Denver Gazette' Newspaper In The Post's Backyard
It can be done if the editor in chief or executive editors decide that a published story does not meet proper standards and should not have been published in the first place. Stories should not be removed because a fact in them is wrong or because subsequent events change the way the story would have been written if published later. For example, an accurate story about someone being charged with a crime should not be removed if, for some reason, the case was later dropped. Unnamed Sources Policy Unnamed sources are an important element in the work of any good news organization. Without them, readers would not get all the information they have a right to expect. But their use requires extra vigilance because anonymity makes misuse or abuse easier.Washington Examiner: Labor Department Rescinds Expanded 'joint Employer' Rule
Readers need to be confident that they can trust sources used by reporters, and the Washington Examiner therefore takes special care when using unidentified sources for information or comment. We regard integrity, credibility, and transparency as of paramount importance. This means that whenever possible we will persuade sources to drop their anonymity and agree to be named. We do not allow anonymity merely as a mild preference.- It is only for when it is genuinely necessary in order to get information without which a story would be incomplete. The Washington Examiner will not allow anonymous smears or personal attacks; if someone wants to condemn someone else by name, we demand that they put their own name to their accusations. This means that the Washington Examiner will use anonymous sources only to publish necessary details. We will not use an anonymous source if the same information is available from another source that does not require concealment. Our editors and reporters are committed to using an anonymous source only if that person has genuine and direct knowledge of the subject on which he or she is giving information.
No comments:
Post a Comment